“Disability Dolls”: A Blessing or a Curse?

I saw an interesting article the other day about dolls specially made to represent people with disabilities. Down Syndrome, cancer, blindness are being represented in some of the new dolls being made, as well as dolls that use wheelchairs. The article gives three different perspectives, one in support of the doll and two against. The support says that children should be able to have dolls that look like them, while the opposition says that it puts too much focus on children’s differences. Personally, much the way I wish dolls representing other races were more readily available (I remember last Christmas finding a non-white doll for my partner’s mixed niece was difficult to say the least), I think that people with disabilities should be represented, even with dolls. I don’t think we should be trying to convince children that they’re no different than “everyone else”. Children don’t fall for that. I think we should be showing children, as cheesy as it sounds, that everyone is different and that we should embrace differences in each other rather than to just pretend they don’t exist. You can find the doll article here.

What do you think? Are dolls representing people with disabilities a good thing or a bad thing?

9 Comments »

  » “Disability Dolls”: A Blessing or a Curse? wrote @

[...] Autism Vox wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptI saw an interesting article the other day about dolls specially made to represent people with disabilities. Down Syndrome, cancer, blindness are being represented in some of the new dolls being made, as well as dolls that use wheelchairs. The article gives three different perspectives, one in support of the doll and two against. The support says that children should be able to have dolls that look like them, while the opposition says that it puts too much focus on children’s differences. Personally, much the way I wish dolls representing other races were more readily available (I remember last Christmas finding a non-white doll for my partner’s mixed niece was difficult to say the least), I think that people with disabilities should be represented, even with dolls. I don’t think we should be trying to convince children that they’re no different than “everyone else”. […] [...]

  Emily wrote @

I agree that there should be dolls of all different kinds…what is “normal,” anyways? I also thought this blog post on the dolls was really insightful –

http://www.disaboom.com/Blogs/karaswims/archive/2008/06/27/move-over-becky-there-are-new-disability-dolls-in-town.aspx

  SC Vashishth wrote @

I think it is good to produce dolls on wheelchairs or dolls portraying other disabilities as an ordinary part of life. Not only dolls, to ensure inclusion and enhance acceptance, children with disabilities should be shown in cartoon networks and shows also. In text books while showing group of friends, there could be one using cane and one on wheelchair or using crutch. It increases their acceptance and is a step towards inclusive world where disability is not looked at as a pity!
Regards
SC Vashishth, Disability Rights Activist, New Delhi, India

  willow wrote @

Children are smart, curious and intuitive. They learn character and empathy by living experiences, not having platitudes shoved down their throats. Giving a child a static object with paralyzed legs in a shiny new wheelchair, a scar on its face, the features of Downs syndrome, or no eyes, will teach them to identify with stereotypes, not reality, and promote misunderstanding and discrimination. I find this as ludicrous as giving him a doll that is a drunk, or mimics a drug overdose. Back then, a doll was an old sock or a carved stick of wood, and the child used his experience and imagination to give it reality. Let your child ask the disabled person in a wheelchair in the elevator how that joystick works, instead of telling him to shut up and you will explain when you get home. Expose him to real people and let him follow his own experiences, and he will not need a limp piece of plastic with pretend paralyzed legs.

  thematrix777 wrote @

I think in general they are a good idea. However, it would depend on the child I was giving it to. If they were overly sensitive about their disability this may not be the right time to introduce a doll.

  Hala J. wrote @

Hey, I’m new to your blog.

Interesting post. I’m actually not against introducing dolls with disabilities, but it depends on the child and what they’ve been exposed to so far.

But I think it’s a good idea because dolls often represent things the child sees in every day life. Disabled people included. I think it’s a very interesting concept. I don’t have kids, but if I did I don’t think I’d be against introducing them to toys like that.

[...] commenter at Fibrofog states point blank that giving a child a doll with the facial features of Down syndrome (or with a [...]

  Tania wrote @

I grew up with Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis. I would have LOVED to have a doll that had a small, underdeveloped jaw like I did/do.

  Alexwebmaster wrote @

Hello webmaster
I would like to share with you a link to your site
write me here preonrelt@mail.ru


Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>